When looking for a particular article, Google Scholar is a valuable tool. It provides information about h-index, i10-index, and the number of citations per article. To access citations, you can click on the title and author of the article. Once you have this information, you can begin looking for potential citations. To make the process even easier, you can narrow your search to a specific author, journal, or topic.
Publish or Perish is a web application that allows you to check an author’s h-index. Simply enter the scholar’s name into the search field, and the program will populate a window with potential matches. Using Google Scholar citation data, Publish or Perish calculates the h-index for a given article. From the list, you can exclude papers that are not relevant to your topic, and see a summary of the author’s h-index. It also calculates the i10-index and the normalized h-index of a single author’s articles. The user’s manual provides a detailed explanation of these methods.
The h-index is a number that describes an author’s research output. It is calculated by counting the number of citations to each of his or her publications. If an author has published five papers, and each article has three citations, then they would have a h-index of three, or a high-h-index. Researchers with similar h-indices can compare each other’s performance to see who has the most citations.
Google Scholar Metrics provide an easy-to-use way to determine the impact of recent articles and summarizes the most recent citations from multiple publications. Using these metrics can help authors choose where to publish new research. The service allows users to browse the top 100 publications, in several languages, ranked by five-year h-index and h-median metrics. In addition to citing documents, users can also find their own citations.
The h-index is a metric that measures the cumulative impact of an author’s scholarly output. It balances quantity with quality by discounting uncited papers. This index can also represent a group of scholars. However, if you want to see the total impact of a single author, you must first know what h-index means. In this article, I’ll discuss how h-index works.
Hirsch’s h-index has been the topic of many debates. Some researchers believe the h-index does not predict the success of a researcher, while others claim it’s less accurate than total citations. While the h-index is often cited as a key indicator of impact, it remains a powerful tool for evaluating a scientist’s output. It has become a standard for measuring scientific output, and is widely used to rank academics and authors.
In addition to searching by title and author, Google Scholar has a special author search. This feature lets you narrow down your search results to only citations by an author’s profile. Unlike PubMed, Google Scholar will often find citations for authors without an account. The citations in the author’s profile are linked to their author profiles. That means you can easily track a researcher’s work.
The h-index of Google Scholar cites a variety of sources. Not only are books and preprints cited in Google Scholar, but you can also find early citations in pre-prints. The h-index also includes publications that were previously uncited. If you’re writing an article for a broader audience, consider using a database like Google Scholar. Its results are more accurate than Scholar’s.
You’ve probably heard of the i10-index in Google Scholar citations, but what does it really mean? It is the number of publications you have published with at least 10 citations. It helps you assess your productivity and can be calculated with the free Publish or Perish software. To find out if your i10-index is high or low, try the Publish or Perish software.
In Google Scholar, you can also find your h-index and i10-index by accessing your public profile. By default, your profile is public, but you can un-tick that option. The h-index will be listed in the upper right corner of your Google Scholar profile, along with the i10-index, which reports how many citations you have. When you’re browsing your Google Scholar citations, you’ll find these two numbers under the author’s name.
Citation variants are minor variations in the bibliographic information of the item. The incorrect page numbers, volume, or issue, or i10-index of an item are common causes of citation variants. In Google Scholar, you can export your published articles and set up email notifications. And you can even add co-authors. You can also export the information from Google Scholar to get your citation count by publication. However, it is important to note that citation counts per publication are not the only metrics you should be tracking. In Google Scholar, you can also find advanced metrics like h-index and i10-index, as well as Cited By measures.
Using bibliometrics is a useful and controversial tool. For example, Web of Science provides you with your h-index, i10-index, and citations per article, excluding self-citations. Another alternative to Scopus is SciVal, which is based on Scopus data, but has more features. But you have to set up a profile first to use SciVal and Publish or Perish. The default display is for top publications in English. To view these articles, click on the h5-index and sort by publication rank.
Hirsch index is a measure of the impact and productivity of an author’s published work. This metric is based on the number of articles cited in other publications. An author with h-index of 10 will have published at least ten papers, each of which has received at least ten citations. A higher Hirsch index means you’re an outstanding researcher. So, don’t neglect this metric.
Hirsch’s index is one of the most popular author-based metrics, but it’s not without flaws. Some academics have h-indexes of hundreds or even thousands, and citation counts are increasing at an incredible rate. The Hirsch index has a derivative index, called the i10-index, which measures the number of publications with 10 or more citations. Unfortunately, this metric is not enough to determine the quality of an academic’s work.
citations per article
There is no one, simple solution for researchers who want to conduct comprehensive literature searches. No single product is sufficient to cover the entire set of citing articles. In one study of JASIST articles, for example, Bauer and Bakkalbasi found that older material was best covered by Web of Science, and they recommended a larger study to identify the optimum search strategy. This study is based on data from a sample of citations for one article in two different indexes.
Citation variants are variations in citation information, and often arise due to variations in the item’s bibliographic information. Citations in Google Scholar can range from 1.5 to 3.4 times that of other databases. The citation rate was also influenced by the journal’s SIGAPS category. To resolve this issue, I suggest that authors add additional data fields to their articles. In addition, authors should add a short biography about themselves to their profile.
The h index of Google Scholar was higher than the other databases, Scopus and Web of Science. Hence, articles published in SIGAPS A are higher in citation count. But if you are not a soil scientist, it’s better to look for journals that fall in SIGAPS B category. The h index of an individual soil scientist is approximately 0.7 times the number of years since the first publication.
In addition to citation counts, Google Scholar also offers an option for users to export their own data. BibTeX and RIS files can be imported into major reference management systems. However, this process may be cumbersome. For this reason, we highly recommend that you use a third party reference manager. It will save you time and ensure the accuracy of your citation data. You’ll be glad you did.
Once you’ve gathered all your published articles, you can also track their citation counts. By setting up your profile, you can view your citation counts per article and other metrics. After you’ve done this, you can set up automated Profile Updates. These updates will keep you informed of any new data. If you have an existing Google Scholar account, you can import your articles into the database. Then, you can use the Citations option to view the citation count for any article.
Among articles published in seven emergency medicine journals, 51% (208/2396) were never cited in Google Scholar or Scopus, and 79 articles had no mention on Twitter. We found a weakly positive correlation between Twitter mentions and Google Scholar citation counts. We can conclude that tweets are an effective strategy to promote research. Moreover, they help authors get more exposure. There are several other ways to maximize citation counts, such as using social media.